Cohen P. Landry
“The Culture within a Culture”
The African American, Native American, and
Mexican American prose and poetry writings are all pieces of great quality
literature. This particular literature is classified as Minority and Immigrant
literature. Many theories and philosophies have been developed to describe and
define the relationship between European-Western concepts, and other countries
with different ethnicities and their concepts in respect to literature. This
European ideology has been fashioned to attempt to classify, define, or
psychologically subjugate people of a particular race, socio-economic status,
ethnicity, nation origin, or in this case, writers of cultural literature. This
American literature classification is based on western perspectives and literary
concepts that do not entirely embrace other cultures or experiences. It also
does not consider the nature and foundations of other ethnic backgrounds and
history. Only when the minority or immigrant writers merge the European
influences with his/her own, a mere diluted version of the natural element of
expression from that writer is created, hence the creation and classification of
Minority and Immigrant literature. Although both forms of literature are distinctively different
in culture, (alternative) narrative, and experiences, there are also strikingly
similar in imagery and context. The most efficient way to differentiate between
both aspects of literature varies according to the subject matter and content of
the writings. The time, variances, and specific events may contrast between both
literature classifications; however the symbols, and dual conflicts used are a
shared characteristic among writers. Most minority or immigrant writers
represent not only their individual point of view, but also the particular group
in which the authors are associated with.
The influence of cultural experiences, along with personal circumstances,
only solidifies the authors’ perspective and aim. Relatively speaking, this
correlated with the literary influences has helped expand the intellect of
minority and immigrant writers to produce many great quality literature works. Their distinctive quality in writing only differs in
narrative, culture, and experiences. Each plot or story created reflects
specific events, whether personal or historical. Each story or plot is sometimes
fictitious in characterization, and setting, but also describes real life
circumstances and experiences, giving it its dynamic appeal. It resembles other
dominant cultural characteristics, but involves its own identity and cultures as
well .This form of narrative is described as an “Alternative Narrative.” African
Americans alternative narrative is achieving “The Dream” which is similar but
detached from the “American Dream”. The Native Americans alternative narrative
is “Loss and Survival,” which describes their struggles with adjusting to
European civilizations. The Mexican American’s alternative narrative is
“Ambivalent Minority,” which describes the compassion for family and culture,
but also involves the assimilation to new ways of life. The African-American alternative
narrative “The Dream” is unique for many reasons. The term minority can have a
variety of definitions. In respect to literature, the minority concept is
contrasted to the foundation of America being the land of opportunity and
liberation for all citizens. Conversely, the African-American’s experience was
extremely different.”The Dream” defines this experience of involuntary
participation in western civilization, as well as being a non-participant in the
advancement of the American culture. It represents a re-connection to past
history, customs, beliefs, and focuses on the collective efficacy of all African
decedents and their communities. This involves legal rights, opportunities for
self employment, and freedom of expression. It also includes and emphasizes the
collaboration between its own people and the conquest for the same ideals
proposed in the Declaration of
Independence. Langston Hughes spoke about “The Dream” by saying,” What
happens to a Dream deferred? Does it dry up like a raisin in the sun? Or fester
like a sore And then run” The Native American alternative
narrative is somewhat different. The idea of “Loss and Survival,” really
epitomizes what the struggle has been for many Natives in America. It is
difficult to classify which term is suitable to represent the Native Americans,
(or even if the term Native American is an acceptable description, for intensive
purposes they are Indigenous Westerners), but it is evident of their exponential
losses that was suffered. They are neither immigrant, nor minorities but a
mysterious, mythical people, who despise innovation and change, and who
inevitably were conquered due to Europeans divine promises from god. The
expansion to the western world has been a weighty loss for many Native tribes.
This includes family, land, livestock, culture, history and present day
relativity. After suffering such losses, the Indigenous Westerners understood
that history repeats, therefore choosing to survive until the original state of
North America returns to prominence. Any classification would be difficult to
describe the Indigenous Westerners, due to the extreme losses and circumstances
that they have faced. The poet Chrystos, refers to the Country of America and a
proposed treaty telling them to, “Go so far we won’t remember you ever came here
take these words back with you” The Mexican American alternative
narrative also has its own unique characteristics. They mostly represent an
immigrant group but can be a minority group as well. Unlike the African American
they have voluntary participation in trying to achieve the “American Dream.”
They actively choose to assimilate to the dominant culture, for economic and
educational purposes. Others travel to America in search for a better
opportunity to raise their family and provide for them. The difference in
Mexican American narrative is that the continued connection with history,
culture and customs are prevalent in modern times due to the constant increase
in contact with traditional lifestyles. This however is also a conflict of
representation because of the history of Mexican-American conflicts of
territory. So who is the Mexican American? The “Ambivalent Minority” narrative
represents the conflict that arises from the Mexican-American when confronted
with the choice to totally embrace the dominant culture. This is evident in
The story of the Virgin of Guadalipe
When Juan Diego is conflicted with decided which path to choose, either become a
messenger or stay loyal to his dying uncle. He approaches this ultimatum and
says, “If I proceed forward, the lady is bound to see me, and I may be detained…
that our first affliction must let us go hurriedly to call a priest, as my poor
uncle certainly awaits him” Nevertheless, there are also strikingly similar
characteristics between minority and immigrant literature writers. These
similarities in imagery and context are used frequently throughout poetry and
stories through symbols and dual conflicts. Many symbols are used for a variety
of reasons in literature. Most symbols are used with images to convey certain
meanings. Although these symbols may provoke positive meaning and feelings, they
may be interpreted as offensive or destructive as well. A dual meaning in one
particular symbol is one characteristic that is shared throughout all minority
and immigrant literature.
In Rudolfo Anaya’s
Bless Me Ultima, The sun and the moon
are symbols that represent two different ways of life and also two different
settings in the story. The llano was the life of an adventurer and developer, in
which represented the Marez blood in Antonio’s father’s side. It also was
located on the opposing side of the bridge. The farmers were represented by the
moon, in which the farmers represent the Luna blood on his mother’s side. This
was also on the opposing side of the llano. Antonio mentions the opposing
lifestyles when he says, “The sun is good. The men of the llano were men of the
sun. The men of the farms along the river were men of the moon” Furthermore, the context used by writers is also similar. Each
plot or story encompasses a certain conflict and resolution. More specifically,
a dual conflict is common among some writers. In Lousie Edrich’s
Love Medicine, June Kashpaw was torn
between living life as a wife and mother, or living “like a no-good morissey” Another example of dual conflict is in
the story Bless Me Ultima. The
character Antonio is conflicted with deciding which side of the family he is
most fitting, and also in which god should he obey and worship. When Antonio was
born, a family member spoke of his destiny stating, “This one will be a Luna,
[and] he will be a farmer and keep our customs and traditions” Both forms of literature are distinctively different in
culture, (alternative) narrative, and experiences; however the similarities in
imagery and context and many other literary components shows how American
Minority literature is attractive and entertaining. The classification of both
minority and immigrant literature only justifies the topic or descriptive term;
it does not resemble the fascinating content that each work of art possesses.
Even though those terms are considered a negative connotation in the view from a
dominant culture perspective, the beauty that each novel contains is expressed
through every phrase and punctuation mark. The combination of artistic use of
prose and articulate dual-representation of symbols, colors, images and
characters, makes The Bluest Eye,
Bless Me Ultima, and
Love Medicine, great reads for a
variety of purposes.
|