|
Thursday 4 September: Anne Bradstreet, “To my Dear and Loving Husband,” N 108. poetry reader / discussion leader: Matt Richards Bradstreet was born Anne Dudley in Northampton, England, March 20, 1612. She was the daughter of Thomas Dudley, a steward of the Earl of Lincoln, and Dorothy Yorke.[1] Due to her family's position she grew up in cultured circumstances and was an unusually well-educated woman for her time, being tutored in history, several languages, and literature. At the age of sixteen she married Simon Bradstreet. Both Anne's father and husband were later to serve as governors of the Massachusetts Bay Colony. Anne and Simon, along with Anne's parents, immigrated to America aboard the Arbella during the "A WAR" in 1630.[2] (Wikipedia). Her works include
Anne Bradstreet died on September 16, 1672, in Andover, Massachusetts, at the age of 60. The precise location of her grave is uncertain as she may either have been buried next to her husband in "the Old Burying Point" in Salem, Massachusetts, or in "the Old Burying Ground" on Academy Road in North Andover, Massachusetts (Wikipedia).
Objectives that apply Objective 1a part 1 - To identify and criticize ideas or attitudes associated with Romanticism, such as desire and loss, rebellion, nostalgia, idealism, the gothic, the sublime, the individual in nature or separate from the masses (White). The other part of this objective that is
significant is - To observe
predictive elements in “pre-Romantic” writings from earlier periods
such as “The Seventeenth Century” and the "Age of Reason."(White).
Analysis This poem by Anne Bradstreet has romantic attitudes ands ideas in it. For example, she says things like “I prize thy love more than whole Mines of gold.” This type of language is ideal and elevated. She is writing this to express how much she loves her husband. She does this by using phrases such as “My love is such that Rivers cannot quench.” I’m sure she loves her husband, but to use such words is definitely a sign that this is a romantic poem. What does make this interesting is that it would fall into the pre-Romantic period because it was written in the seventeenth century before the American Romantic movement of the nineteenth. Bradstreet is ahead of her time and seems to use this desire for her husband to write a truly moving poem.
Matt's questions: 1: Does this poem qualify as
a pre-Romantic poem or does its Romantic qualities makes us look at it as a
Romantic poem regardless of it being written before the American Romantic
period? Instructor's question: Matt's "Analysis" above involves both the popular and academic meanings for "Romantic": popular = "how much she loves her husband"; "her desire for her husband" academic = "language is ideal and elevated" + references to centuries / periods
How do you reconcile the popular and academic? Exclusionary or related? How? (either way)
|