LITR 4232: American Renaissance
University of Houston-Clear Lake, spring 2003

Student Presentation Summary

Thursday, 3 April: Melville, Billy Budd (complete; through page 2714)
Reader: Corrie Lawrence
Discussion notes: Lisa Bailey

We will be using a blend of objectives one and three to approach this text:

1. To use critical techniques of "close reading"… as [a way] of studying classic… literature and cultural history of the "American Renaissance" (the generation before the Civil War).

3. To use literature as a basis for discussing representative problems and subjects of American culture (New Historicism), such as equality; …class; the individual and the community; nature; the writer's conflicted presence in an anti-intellectual society.

Objective 1: Setting the Stage Textually

In Billy Budd, Herman Melville sets a complex stage with numerous forces at work against each other.

He painstakingly erects multiple complex levels of good and evil; intelligence and ignorance; right and wrong; feeling and rationality.  Each of the three main characters is keenly drawn as a varying representation of these abstract concepts.

Billy Budd Baby Budd (2675), Beauty (2682), the Handsome Sailor (2676) 

Budd is the embodiment of “simplicity” (2679) – not intellectual

“one to whom not  yet has been proffered the questionable apple of knowledge…” (2662) – innocent

“welkin eyed” (2678)

“the jewel of ‘em” (2659)

“peacemaker” (2659)

speech impediment or “vocal defect” (2663) --  tragic flaw?

“’sweet and pleasant fellow’” with the “spirit of a game cock” (2659)

John Claggart – master-at-arms, Jemmy Legs (2675)

Characterized by a “mania of an evil nature” (2678)

“a depravity according to nature” (2678)

“a peculiar ferreting genius” (2673)  --intelligent, experienced

“nothing was known of his former life” (2671)

“hint of something abnormal or defective in the constitution of his blood” (2671)

“lurked a bit of accent in his speech”  (2671) …suggestive of foreign birth

“red light would flash forth from his eye” (2686)  -- deceit

Captian the Honorable Fairfax Vere Starry Vere (2669)

“a sailor of distinction” (2668)

“seen much service…various engagements” (2668) -- experienced

“mindful of the welfare of his men” (2668)

“thoroughly versed in the science of his profession” (2668) -- educated

“grave in his bearing” (2668) -- serious

on occasion had a “certain dreaminess of mood” (2668)

I agree with Allison Amaya’s comments on this text in the spring of 2001 when she asserts that, “several passages in the story use references to the eyes to symbolize how they are a window to the intelligence a person has.” This is one of the points of contrast made in character description.  For example Budd’s eyes are innocent, blue, constant and clear; while Claggarts are an unnatural violet mentioned to sometimes flash with red (2686), and then change to a “muddy purple” when he confronts Budd in Vere’s presence (2692).

Examples of character provided in the previous sketches, such as Amaya’s reference to the eyes, suggest that the characters are for the most part distinctly good or evil, experienced or not. – After setting the scene for the reader with these circumstances in the first half of the novel, Melville bombards the reader with complicated matters concerning justice in the second half.

 

Objective 2: The Problem of Justice and Morality

With style in keeping with the true classicists, Melville leaves the reader with a not entirely complete picture -- some events are forever left in a haze.

As the main conflict of the story is presented, both Billy and Claggart’s characters remain static for the most part. It is Captain Vere that is required to make and live with monumental decisions – And he does this…but what are we to think of the process?

Melville does not sort these issues out for us; he instead challenges the reader to intellectually assume responsibility for deciding if Captain Vere’s decision was ethical and upright.

“Who in the rainbow can draw the line where the violet tint ends and the orange begins? Distinctly we see the difference of the colors, but where exactly does the first blendingly enter into the other?  So with sanity and insanity.” (2694)

“Whether Captain Vere…was really the sudden victim of any degree of aberration, every one must determine for himself by such light as this narrative may afford.”  (2694)

(1)   Was Captain Vere acting in his right mind? – If so, is he vindicated in his handling of Billy’s case?

We are told by the narrator that Claggart hated Billy because he was driven by a “passion in its profoundest”…”the gall of [his] envy” (2680). On page 2679, this rhetorical question is posed:

“Did anybody ever seriously confess to envy? Something there is in it universally felt to be far more shameful than even felonious crime.”

Envy drove an otherwise seemingly intelligent/rational man to a heinous end –

(2) Is this a realistic or romantic motive? Does this motive applicably transcend the bounds of literature and time?

 

Discussion notes:

Question 1: Was Captain Vere acting in his right mind?  If so, is he vindicated in his handling of Billy’s case?

Jennifer: I think hindsight is always 20/20.

Dawn: It’s a catch-22.  You have to do something.

Dr. White: Well Captain Vere loves Billy, but on the other hand, who is his duty to? Billy, the ship, the service , the nation?  The right answer changes.

Deterrean: He sees both sides, the duality of his decision.  He knew he had to do something to insure order on the ship.

Corrie: Was it so urgent that he couldn’t wait?

Sandra: I think he felt it was that urgent.

Deterrean: Well, given the context of the situation, it wasn’t an insane decision. 

Sandra: As readers we can see both sides of the situation.

Deterrean: The situation casts a darker light on what Billy did.  On the mythic side, Billy can be equated with Jesus sacrificing his life.

Jennifer: What is the real motivation for Melville’s story resembling Christ’s story, but not?

Laurie: Maybe the question is rather between justice and mercy?

Question 2: Is this a realistic or romantic motive?  Does this motive applicably transcend the bounds of literature and time?

Deterrean: Usually the reason envy arises is you see the completeness of others and the incompleteness of yourself.  We can certainly understand this in our time.

Dr. White: I think love and envy get tangled up sometimes; where does one end and the other begin? Compare Corrie's quotation of Melville on the colors of the rainbow.

Dawn: That incompleteness and self-loathing are so far away from that spiritual love that it really points out the depravity in man.

Deterrean: When you see someone so special, it’s like God has shown them to you, sent them to you.  In some ways Satan is pitiable in that he is so far removed from the light of God, it makes him darker.

Dr. White: Good connection to the Byronic hero.

Deterrean: It’s that being on the outside of love that drove Claggart mad.