LITR 4232 American Renaissance

Sample Student Research Project 2012
Journal

Angela Sims

28 April 2012

The Legacy Left Behind By the Great American Poet

Introduction:

I have been enthralled by Walt Whitman since the first day of class. When I heard “I Sing the Body Electric” recited aloud, I was moved by the lyrical verse. The subject matter he wrote about seemed other-worldly or from another time. I longed to hear more and to know more about this poetic genius. His name was familiar to me, yet I could not place his works or importance. Not wanting to fall into the trap of the “biographical fallacy,” I moved ahead, resolved not to find Whitman “inside” his poems, rather to find out his motivation and purpose behind his writings.

My first action of research included reading more of Whitman’s works. Perusing through my copy of Leaves of Grass, I was perplexed by all of the different themes moving through each poem. Some were about lust and longing, others about death and reconciliation with our world. One thing that remained constant throughout was Whitman’s distinct flavor. When I read, the words flowed like water from my lips, filling the air with the sweet melody of his lyrical structure. Many of the terms and associations with Romanticism popped up in the text as I turned through the pages. In particular, “A Woman Waits for Me” proved to be a puzzling analysis. Was Walt Whitman purely talking about the release of physical pleasure in his racy description of sex, or was he speaking of a higher purpose to our biological structure, that is, leaving behind a legacy? Of course, in a similarly themed poem, “My Legacy,” Whitman exposes the differences in leaving behind treasures and great inheritances verses leaving behind simple tokens and memories for his loved ones. In that poem, the business man “leaves money to certain companions to buy tokens, souvenirs of gems and gold, while he “[binds] together and [bequeaths] little souvenirs of camps and soldiers, with my love in this bundle of songs” (408). But in “A Woman Waits for Me,” Whitman is not alluding to any material objects left behind in death, but rather the familial line that results in proliferation.

In this simple page and a half poem, I find the holistic personification of Whitman and his work. Stylistically, this piece offers the trifecta of Whitman’s main structural devices: free verse, parallelism, and the catalogue. His changing themes throughout the poem touch upon relationships between self and others, sexual exchange and release, transcendence, and absorption. These things all point to Whitman and his flair, but I find his final line most telling about the legacy of his art he leaves behind. “I shall look for loving crops from the birth, life, and death, immortality, I plant so lovingly now” (Whitman 88).

Whitman’s works certainly defy death and time, and have become a legacy to America and the world. He continues to charm readers over a hundred years later. His poetry and ideas revolutionized the landscape of literature and those influences are still seen throughout contemporary texts. Whitman has risen to legendary status as a writer and poet. He and his works are still widely studied and revered in academia, placing him in his rightful place as an American treasure. Looking through biographical information, academic articles, and literary handbooks, I intended to unmask the mystery that is Walt Whitman. How did he become this great status in American literature? Who is he? These are just a few of the questions I hope to answer by the time I have concluded my research.

Biographical Highlights:

          Whitman seemed to have had a normal upbringing in a working-class family. He was born on Long Island in 1819 to Walt Sr. and Louisa Von Velsor. His famous, longer poem, “Out of the Cradle Endlessly Rocking,” is thought to be an autobiographical rumination of his childhood on Long Island. “Over the sterile sands and the fields beyond, where the child leaving his bed wander’d alone, bareheaded, barefoot, down from the shower’d halo” (Whitman 209). These images certainly offer a glimpse of Whitman’s boyhood, though in reminiscence alone, not necessarily as a dream-vision or memory.

The thing I found most fascinating about his early life, was his apparent lack of advanced education. “By the age of eleven, Whitman was done with his formal education” (“Walt Whitman Archive”). When he finished with formal school, he started taking odd jobs to make money. His first job was working in a law office in Brooklyn. From there he got a job at a newspaper where he worked as a newspaper apprentice at the Long Island “Patriot.” It was here where he developed his reading and writing skills by the continual exposure to the creating and publishing of written word.

Another interesting job Whitman held was that of the country school teacher. When he taught school, Whitman used progressive techniques “encouraging students to think aloud instead of reciting, involving his students in educational games” (“Walt Whitman Archive”). One of Whitman’s poems, “There Was a Child Went Forth,” has been read as Whitman’s very own educational philosophy. In the poem, Whitman describes the many sights a child may see in one day. These visions extend from the house and nature into the city streets. The final line reads, “These become part of that child who went forth every day, and who now goes, and will always go forth every day” (306). Basically, the child becomes the things he is surrounded by and is influenced by the people he sees. This educational principle seems to be rooted in the concept of modeling, which is a widely used method of instruction today. Whitman did not teach long, for he was not happy living in the country. He was much more suited for the bustling city full of people.

Whitman began his writing career composing short fiction for literary magazines. He used his experiences to write such stories like “Death in the School Room,” where we can assume he adapted his involvements with teaching. His short story vocation did not last long; it is estimated that he penned around two dozen stories (Folsom). From there he arose as a journalist and finally started dabbling in poetry. The rise of Whitman as a poet can be traced through many years. He did the majority of poetry writing during the first 10 years of his career. During the rest of the time, he reworked and revised poems, resulting in multiple different editions of his most well-known collection of poetry, Leaves of Grass.

It is said that Whitman’s writing abruptly transformed during the Civil War. “For three years during the Civil War he ministered to injured soldiers in and around Washington D.C.” (Lehman 11). Whitman was quite affected by this experience and it led to him expanding his writing to things like wounds and warriors and inspired his poems, “Reconciliation” and “Vigil Strange I Kept on the Field One Night.” There is a definite shift in his writing pre- and post-Civil War. Whitman witnessed, first-hand, the devastation of war and death. In his 1866 poem, “Reconciliation,” Whitman works to reconcile his feelings about the sights he saw in war and in the wounded. “Beautiful that war and all its deeds of carnage must in time be utterly lost,” Whitman writes (268). It may seem problematic that Whitman describes the war as beautiful in this line; however, Whitman appears to be speaking to the idea that the passion and “fight” of each side will be lost to time and it will be a misunderstood action in the history of our country. He plainly equalizes both sides: “for my enemy is dead, a man divine as myself is dead” (268). The “reconciliation” that Whitman may be aiming for in this piece of text, is one that does not condemn man in his pursuit, but humanizes the death and loss each side suffered.

Walt Whitman on the Web:

A simple Google search led to the great mecca of Whitman information: www.whitmanarchive.org. “The Walt Whitman Archive is an electronic research and teaching tool that sets out to make Whitman's vast work, for the first time, easily and conveniently accessible to scholars, students, and general readers” (Folsom). The website is an expansive resource that documents Whitman’s life, his works, his letters, and also some criticism and commentary from others. Ed Folsom and Kenneth M. Price started this project in the mid 1990’s and continue to add and compile Whitman’s works on the site. They began their labor of love to pay homage to Whitman and ensure that his legacy would last. Not only does the website publish his texts, but also offers guides to reading Whitman poetry and various criticisms about each work. This website is the ultimate Whitman resource.

As far as the Whitman writing, there are six different American editions of Leaves of Grass, not counting the so-called “deathbed edition” of 1891-92 that Whitman was working on before he passed away. These are all featured on the sites along with images of some of Whitman’s manuscripts penned in own hand. Most notably is Whitman’s own personal journal, the 1860 Leaves, known as the “blue book.” That book contains hundreds of Whitman’s manuscript annotations, revisions, additions, and deletions. If I would have had 200 hours to devote to this project, I would have certainly spent more time reading through those manuscripts. While sifting through the “blue book,” I noticed notes in the corners of the page, lines crossing out words and sentences discarded by Whitman, and various ink colors (probably representing the process in which his poems were created). Ultimately, these manuscripts give an insider perspective of the approach and thought process of Whitman to his poetry. It is also of note that his work was continually evolving throughout his life. Many of his poems in the first edition of Leaves of Grass were reworked or repurposed in the later editions. An interesting question was raised when reading about the cyclical revising and editing of his poetry. Was Whitman ever satisfied with his writing? Maybe he was evolving as a person; so too was his craftsmanship.

Aside from the reading materials, the site also has pictures of Whitman through the years and an audio recording of a 36-second wax cylinder recording of what is thought to be Whitman's voice reading four lines from the poem “America.” The gravely recording speaks these words:

Centre of equal daughter, equal sons,

All, all alike endear’d, grown, ungrown, young or old,

Strong, ample, fair, enduring, capable, rich

Perennial with the Earth, with Freedom, Law, and Love (419).

To think that Whitman’s own voice was able to be captured reading his own words and then to be put onto his website is unbelievable. His works have left behind a great legacy, but his words echo the sentiments that our country was founded on. He wrote “America” in 1888, long after the civil war had ended and slaves had been emancipated. The poem smacks of Romanticism and almost reads as a charge to the American people. Whitman uses his poem to render the challenging ideologies at force in our country and to encourage a convergence of those differing ideologies into a single force of political progress. Since America is “perennial,” we will return to our original ways and to our original intent for founding this great country. Whitman’s political and social ideals seep through his words, but in a non-threatening manner. His words are encoded to challenge the problems facing the country in a symbolic manner.

Overall the website is a great resource and should be looked at by all Whitman enthusiasts. This website provided a spring board to my research, filling me in on the necessary background information, while giving me leads to find more specifics about Whitman. The information compiled is accurate and many times has the original document to show its exact form.

The Use of Language

          Whitman certainly was known for his use of language and the way he put words together to signify meaning. His poems reflect his extensive vocabulary and penchant for putting together words to express ideals that words were not able to capture before. Whitman’s “organic theory of language” is promoted in The Walt Whitman Handbook, written by Gay Wilson Allen. “His poetry was marked by a bold use of words, by a large and indiscriminate vocabulary. He mingled with the resilient, colorful words of common speech with highly literary and foreign words, caring little for their precise meaning and much for their sound and suggestiveness” (Allen 560). Whitman’s poetry does not simply move at contriving meaning through only using the words. He also constructs his argument through the structure. The way the poem looks is as much a part of the meaning as the words behind it.

          Mary Elizabeth Burtis echoes Allen’s sentiments of Whitman’s idea of language in her article reviewing Allen’s “handbook” in the American Speech journal. In the article, she suggests that Whitman’s highly stylized use of language suggests experimentation rather than defined word usage. Whitman “believed that words were symbols of things, that nature itself was a symbol. In this view, distinctions of high and low, good and bad, disappeared” (Buris 203). Using this application of Whitman’s use of words would rectify the potential problem of calling war “beautiful” in his poem, “Reconciliation,” referred to earlier in the journal. The “beautiful war” would serve a symbol for something else. Nature or life could be seen as a beautiful war in this aspect. Whatever the true intention behind the poem, Whitman does have a habit of expanding the lens of his work to include many interpretations. That may be the beauty of his poetry. The reader can inflect their own meaning to his verse.

Death is in the Eye of Whitman

Browsing through the endless list of online academic articles, “The Visionary Walt Whitman” caught my attention. David Lehman writes in The American Poetry Review about Whitman’s rise in success and his extraordinarily skilled craft and vision he brought to American literature. “Dickinson, the poet of dashes and telegraphic urgency, and Whitman, the poet of the deep breath and the long line, are alike in the extent to which they obsess about death” (Lehman 12). Immediately Lehman begins comparing the lyrical style that Dickinson and Whitman share. Some subject matter, such as death and love, are also common between the two poets. Yet, that is where any other similarities cease. Dickinson, he continues, leads the life of private solidarity while “Whitman seems to represent the antithetical idea” (Lehman 11). While Whitman does have an obvious public dimension, Lehman points out that Whitman may embody both a public and a private self.

In his poems he gives a voice to his secrets, the secret that can be stated in a single word: the word initially withheld and then released and reiterated in “Out of the Cradle Endlessly Rocking.” In this poem Whitman reveals the genesis of his poetic vocation: it is death as a fact, a word, a condition (Lehman 11).

This motivation is powerful and apparent in many of Whitman’s poems. Without the power of death, there is no meaning in life.

          Taking Lehman’s point about Whitman’s obsession with death, we can go back and apply the principles to the poem, “A Woman Waits for Me.” The element of death and impermanence flows through the lines. “The babes I beget upon you are to beget babes in their turn” highlights the natural order of life. Whitman believes that beauty has a reason for being in the face of a most ultimate death. “The mind’s ability to contemplate its own extinction is Whitman’s major motive for metaphor” (Lehman 13). These metaphors add a deeper element to his subject matter. Whether Whitman is speaking about a dead soldier in a coffin, a child learning from things he sees, or the pleasure of sexual exchange, Death always has its watchful eye on the living. It is almost like an echo from the bible about living in this world, instead of living beyond it.

Conclusion:

          This assignment greatly enhanced my understanding of Walt Whitman, not only as a person, but as a presence. The journey of finding reason and understanding in Whitman and his works became my “romantic quest,” of sorts. Did I find a decisive consensus on Whitman? Unfortunately, I failed in that discovery. However, love him or hate him, Whitman evokes an emotional decision of his poetry. His words, though, have a way of staying with you, long after your eyes have glazed over the page. Reading about his life and rise to success in his writing proved to be a worthwhile venture. Many other poets had early success in their twenties and some did not live past their mid-thirties. Whitman lived the entire lifetime of some of the greats, and only found his poetic passion at the age of 36. Whitman died at the age of 73; he was still perfecting his poems when he passed away. Even in his death, we find poetry and a romantic feeling of life fulfilled.

This quest, or assignment, deepened my respect for Whitman as a writer and artist. If I would have had an entire semester, or year, to devote solely to this reason, I would have liked to research further into his influence on his peers and contemporaries. When reading through various articles, I found a great deal of information regarding negative reactions to his works. For instance, in Jerome Loving’s article in the Walt Whitman Quarterly Review, he retells the story of when Whitman’s lawyer friend, Tom Donaldson, collected contributions to buy a new horse and carriage for his old, ailing friend, Walt. William Dean Howells and John Greenleaf Whittier are two writers who contributed to the cause, but did not wish to have their name associated with Whitman. The article also cited that Mark Twain was hesitant to get involved with the poet “whose book had been ‘banned in Boston’ back in 1882” (Loving 141).

Another path of research could have intersected the works of Whitman and Dickinson. They are usually linked because of their stark style similarities. I also would have liked to research Dickinson and compare and contrast their works and lives. Dickinson, from what I remember, led a life secluded, much different than Whitman’s social presence everywhere. There seemed to be many resources on this subject, along with much on Whitman as a homosexual poet. I shied away from the sexual orientation aspect of Whitman because I feel it was overexploited as a topic.   

In closing, much can be taken away from the study of Whitman, as a writer, along with Whitman’s poetry. His colorful past continues to challenge readers and influence writers and other artists. The legacy he leaves his country is one of freedom, diversity, curiosity, and personal exploration. Through his poetry we strive to find meaning and application to our own lives. “I shall look for loving crops from the birth, life, and death, immortality, I plant so lovingly now,” becomes an anthem of the crops (his work) Whitman so lovingly tended to that we, as a nation, get to harvest and stamp our “USA” symbol onto, in prideful admiration.

Works Cited

Allen, Gay Wilson. Walt Whitman Handbook,. Chicago: Packard and, 1946. Print.

Burtis, Mary Elizabeth. "Walt Whitman Handbook." American Speech 21.3 (1946): 203-04. Print.

Lehman, David. "The Visionary Walt Whitman." The American Poetry Review 37.1 (2008): 11-13. Print.

Lisk, Thomas D. "Walt Whitman's Attic." The Massachusetts Review, Inc. 47.1 (2006): 154-67. Print.

Loving, Jerome. "Whitman Surprised: The Poet in 1885." Walt Whitman Quarterly Review 28.3 (2011): 141-44. Print.

MacPhail, Scott. "Lyric Nationalism: Whitman, American Studies, and the New Criticism." Texas Studies in Literature and Language 44.2 (2002): 133-60. Print.

" The Walt Whitman Archive. Ed. Ed Folsom and Kenneth M. Price. Web. 20 Apr. 2012. <http://www.whitmanarchive.org>.

Whitman, Walt. Leaves of Grass. New York, NY: HarperCollins, 2000. Print."The Walt Whitman Archive.