LITR
4328 American Renaissance / Model Assignments

Sample Student Research Project 2016:
Essay
Clark 
Omo
17 
November 2016
The Pessimistic Experiment
I 
first encountered this short story during my studies in grade school of American 
Literature. As an author, Nathaniel Hawthorne is an intriguing study. Though he 
is a member of the American Renaissance, and perhaps the later part of the 
American Romantic period, his style differs greatly from other Romantic authors. 
He does not approach the basic attributes of humanity, such as desire, passion, 
motivation, and others, in the same ways as other authors more emblematic of the 
Romantic style do, particularly the Transcendentalists. Like Poe, Hawthorne 
paints a dark picture of humanity’s condition, and he does not shy away from 
portraying its more vain and despicable natures. He demonstrates this in perhaps 
his most well-known novel, The Scarlet 
Letter, but another story that exemplifies Hawthorne’s dark themes is “Dr. 
Heidegger’s Experiment”. The elements characteristic of the American Gothic 
permeate this story from beginning to end, along with other aspects of the 
Romantic style. Though not as much a musician as Poe or a grand epic writer as 
Melville, Hawthorne’s stories get to the center of the issue. This approach not 
only cements Hawthorne in the Gothic pantheon, but also distinguishes him from 
his fellow authors and contemporaries in many substantial ways.
The 
first characteristic of this story to be examined is Hawthorne’s use of the 
usual Gothic language. The first example of this language is the revealing of 
Dr. Heidegger’s room. The story goes “It was a dim, old-fashioned chamber, 
festooned with cobwebs, and besprinkled with antique dust.” (201). This is the 
usual use of the Gothic theme. The room is clearly old, covered in cobwebs, and 
laden with dust so aged it is “antique”. Hawthorne utilizes the Gothic 
conventions well here. The atmosphere is clearly set. This old room, neglected 
and ill-kept, creates an eerie sensation that generates a feeling of subtle 
secrecy. That which is old is best at keeping secrets, for what was known can be 
forgotten and then stored within the deepest recesses of time. That is what this 
room contains. The narrator goes on to describe the room’s contents: “Around the 
walls stood several oaken bookcases, the lower shelves of which were filled with 
rows of gigantic folios and black-letter quartos,” (201). Thus, the mysterious 
library has been constructed. Not only is the room ancient enough to hold 
secrets, but it contains books that are large and imposing enough to possess 
them as well. The room also contains a “bronze bust of Hippocrates, with which, 
according to some authorities, Dr. Heidegger was accustomed to hold 
consultations…” (201). A lifeless statue of an ancient historical figure is 
another excellent use of the Gothic. One cannot help but feel this statue has as 
much knowledge of the secrets this room holds as the books. And, of course, Dr. 
Heidegger speaks to it, which sends a note resonating with isolation and mild 
dementia through the reader’s mind. Furthermore, the room also contains a “a 
small round table, as black as ebony.” (202). The centerpiece of the room must 
be black “as ebony”. Black has a multitude of connotations and symbolisms 
associated with it, but here, when mixed with ancient and mysterious feel of the 
room, the color serves to heighten the air of dark secrecy. Black is a dark 
color, so it can hold and obscure many things. The Gothic themes continue 
through the description of the water in the glass. As the day goes on, a “mild 
and moonlike splendor gleamed from within the vase, and rested alike on the four 
guests” (207). Here, nature itself has infiltrated the mysterious air of the 
setting. The moon, the light of the night, bestows its splendor upon the water 
from the Fountain of Youth, and thus upon the four guests. Why a moonlike 
splendor? As mentioned before, the moon is the light of the night. Unlike the 
sun, which is bright and clear, the moon is eerie and usually surrounded by 
darkness on all sides. As said before, darkness is mysterious for covering 
secrets. Such is true with the moon. And the moon infuses its mystery into the 
vase, and therefore the water, as well.
Beyond the clearly gothic Language, there also exists the use of Transcendental 
themes and motifs as well. One of the best examples is when the four guests 
first begin their experience with the water from the Fountain of Youth. The 
water was “impregnated with an effervescent gas, for little bubbles were 
continually ascending from the depths of the glasses, and bursting in silver 
spray at the surface.” (204). The reader seems to follow these bubbles in the 
water as they rise and then burst. And when they burst, they burst with “silvery 
spray” (204). This is an excellent point of description, one that seems to carry 
the reader to another place, beautifully and tastefully. The effects this water 
has on the surrounding audience, Killigrew, Wycherly, Medbourne, and Gascoigne, 
also demonstrates the Transcendentalist effect: “As the liquor diffused a 
pleasant perfume, the old people doubted not that it possessed cordial and 
comfortable properties…” (204). Simply after catching the aroma of the liquid, 
the four old ones immediately feel its affects. The story goes on to say that 
though the old ones are “utter skeptics” to the liquid’s power, they nonetheless 
“were inclined to swallow it at once.” (204).  Hawthorne 
uses the Transcendentalist methods here to create an atmosphere of ascendant 
pleasure. The liquid possesses an ability to even turn the skeptic to an instant 
believer, simply through pleasing the sense of smell. 
Perhaps another use of the Transcendentalist motifs is the description of Doctor 
Heidegger himself as he watches the four friends revel in their reacquired 
youth. The doctor’s “venerable figure” is sitting in a “high-backed, elaborately 
carved, oaken armchair with a gray dignity of aspect that might have well 
befitted that very Father Time”. This is a very Transcendentalist set of 
language. Doctor Heidegger has become a kind of piece of myth while sitting in 
his chair, watching his four friends celebrate being young again. By equating 
Dr. Heidegger with “Father Time”, the doctor obtains a position of great wisdom. 
He has transcended his surroundings, perhaps even the reality, and thus has 
become a kind of holy and ancient fatherly figure, perhaps closer to God and 
even Nature than anything around him.
Now 
that the elements of Gothic and Transcendentalist Romanticism in “Dr. 
Heidegger’s Experiment” have been examined, another aspect of this story 
deserves attention. The pessimism evident in the story. Unlike the great 
Transcendentalists Emerson and Whitman who tend to glorify man’s nature and his 
connection to nature, the pessimism of Hawthorne tends to attack these themes 
and morals, and instead portrays the darker, more sinister parts of human 
nature. Such is the case of “Dr. Heidegger’s Experiment”. The first way in which 
the story tackles this theme is in the description of the four guests.
The 
four guests, Mr. Medbourne, Colonel Killigrew, Mr. Gascoigne, and the Widow 
Wycherly, all have one thing in common: they have all fallen from grace. As the 
narrator describes them, they are “all melancholy old creatures, who had been 
unfortunate in life, and whose greatest misfortune it was that they were not 
long ago in their graves.” (201). Mr. Medbourne at one point had been a 
“prosperous merchant, but lost his all by a frantic speculation, and was now 
little better than a mendicant.”  (201). 
Colonel Killigrew had “wasted his best years, and his health and substance, in 
the pursuit of sinful pleasures which had given birth to a brood of pains, such 
as the gout, and divers other torments of soul and body.” (201). Mr. Gascoigne 
was “a ruined politician, a man of evil fame…till time had buried him from the 
knowledge of the present generation…” (201). And the Widow Wycherly was “a great 
beauty in her day; but for a long while past, she had lived in deep seclusion, 
on account of certain scandalous stories which had prejudiced the gentry of the 
town against her.” (201). These characters at one point or another had gained a 
certain amount of fame or success, but they have also faded either into 
obscurity or been buried by failure. This is not a Transcendentalist theme 
whatsoever. If anything, this is in exact contrast to the common themes utilized 
by Transcendentalists, such as man gaining a higher understanding and inner 
glory by connecting with his environment. There is no glory here in this 
setting. Though Hawthorne has used some aspects of the Transcendentalist style, 
he does not let them dominate his narrative. Furthermore, each of these 
characters demonstrates the pessimism for human nature and perfection so 
espoused by Transcendentalists and Romanticists alike. As Fairbanks says in his 
essay, “For Hawthorne…the source of evil was the human heart, and the human 
heart was a ‘foul cavern’” (976). Hawthorne believed that humanity itself was 
innately and inherently flawed. This is an idea that is astutely opposed to the 
founding ideologies of mainstream Romantics. While Romanticism depends upon the 
inner goodness of the human spirit to triumph over those who have decided to go 
astray, the pessimism that pervades “Dr. Heidegger’s Experiment” serves as a 
direct counter to that ideal. Instead of portraying humans as innately righteous 
and their every effort as a method of trying to break free of the constraints 
placed upon them by their societies, Hawthorne has decided to portray these four 
“venerable friends”, a use of the word that Scanlon notes is ironic (254), as 
what they are: vain, fickle, and arrogant. For, after they all imbibe the waters 
of the Fountain of the Youth and “Age, with its miserable train of cares, and 
sorrows, and diseases, was remembered only as the trouble of a dream from which 
they had joyously awoke.” (207), the venerable friends immediately transition 
back to their old ways.
After 
the “the exhilarating gush of youth life shot through their veins” and they have 
cried “We are young! We are young!” (207), the four so-called friends revert to 
treachery and vanity again. As the narrator noted at the beginning of the story, 
Killigrew, Gascoigne, and Medbourne were all lovers at one point of the Widow 
Wycherly (201). As this clear foreshadowing indicates, the three men, once 
they’ve seen her reacquired beauty, begin to fight over her.
 Widow Wycherly first goes to Doctor 
Heidegger and says “Doctor, you dear old soul, get up and dance with me!” (207). 
Doctor Heidegger replies, “Pray excuse me, I am old and rheumatic, and my 
dancing days were over long ago.” (207). The others quickly decide to take 
advantage of the situation. “Dance with me, Clara!” cries Killigrew. (2070. “No, 
no, I will be her partner!” goes Mr. Gascoigne (207).
 “She promised me her hand, fifty years 
ago!” (208) goes Mr. Medbourne. Soon, the three men “gathered round her. One 
caught bot her hands in his passionate grasp—another threw his arm about her 
waist—the third buried his hand among the glossy curls that clustered beneath 
the widow’s cap.” To the observer, this situation could be described as utterly 
comical. Here are these men and a woman, who have lost so much of their lives to 
misfortune and malpractice, given a chance to do right and better themselves 
again, only to break into a lover’s struggle as soon as they are young again. 
Hawthorne’s pessimism here is extremely apparent. As can be discerned from this 
scene, Hawthorne has a rather dismal view of human nature. When given a chance 
to do the right thing, to correct a wrong, or to do things better, according to 
Hawthorne, people will not do so. Like bees to honey, they will repeat the same 
wrongs and squander their newfound chance at redemption. Gascoigne, Medbourne, 
Killigrew, and Wycherly are no different. As soon as the opportunity presents 
itself, they throw themselves into a fit of passion. Widow Wycherly, who most 
would think would be at her wit’s end in such a situation, is instead “blushing, 
panting, struggling, chiding, laughing…she strove to disengage herself, yet 
still remained in their triple embrace.” (208). Wycherly, if she truly felt 
threatened by these three men groping her, would not remain in their “triple 
embrace” while “laughing”. She would be fighting with all her strength to 
release herself. Instead, as indicated by this passage, she seems to be enjoying 
these three men fighting over her. Indeed, the Widow Wycherly “neither granted 
nor quite withheld her favors” from these three men that hold her. So, the Widow 
too is stricken with the same vanity and arrogance that plagues her friends. 
She, in fact, is in quite a state of power compared to her friends. She is 
goading them and tempting them by giving them nothing and, at the same time, 
giving them something. Again, this proves Hawthorne’s message even more. Humans 
will revert to their old ways when given the chance to experience them in fuller 
and more gratifying magnitude when given the chance.
However, Doctor Heidegger serves as an example of what man can be. As Cooke 
makes clear “Dr. Heidegger points out to the four derelicts that, with the 
experiences of a lifetime to guide them, it would be a sin and shame if they did 
not become models of virtue and wisdom.” (144). And, as Hawthorne has 
illustrated, they are lax when it comes to following his advice. Heidegger does 
not even lament when the water has spilled upon the floor: “…the Water of 
Youth is all lavished on the ground. Well—I bemoan it not; for if the fountain 
gushed at my very doorstep, I would not stoop to bate my lips in it…Such is the 
lesson ye have taught me!” (209). Heidegger here has served as the counter to 
his friend’s desires. Unlike them, he is satisfied with not partaking in this 
revelry. Though Hawthorne has indeed infused this story with a pessimistic 
overtone, his inclusion of Heidegger leaves a resounding note that reminds the 
reader that, although a good deal of humanity may be beyond hope, there is still 
hope nonetheless.
Hawthorne truly is master of his craft. In this single story, “Dr. Heidegger’s 
Experiment”, he has managed to blend the Gothic with the Transcendental, and 
altogether manage to present a counter to Transcendental and Romantic themes by 
providing a stunningly down to earth portrayal of the vileness and fickleness 
human nature. “Dr. Heidegger’s Experiment,” though under the plethora of other 
works by Hawthorne, is another clear example of how Hawthorne’s style strikes 
true when it comes to giving the truth rather than presenting an exaggerated and 
overly-glorious look at the reality around us.
Works 
Cited
Cooke, Alice Lovelace. “Some Evidences of Hawthorne’s Indebtedness to Swift.”
Studies in English, no.18, 1938, pp. 
140-162. JSTOR. 
http://www.jstor.org/stable/20779502. Accessed 14 Nov. 2016.
Hawthorne, Nathaniel. “Dr. Heidegger’s Experiment.”
Fundamentals of Literature. edited by 
Rebecca Moore, BJU Press, 2002, pp. 201-209. 
Fairbanks, Henry G. “Sin, Free Will, and ‘Pessimism’ in Hawthorne.”
PMLA, vol. 71, no. 5, 1956, pp. 
975-989. JSTOR. 
http://www.jstor.org/stable/460522. Accessed 15 Nov. 2016.
Scanlon, Lawrence E. “That Very Singular Man, Dr. Heidegger.”
Nineteenth Century Fiction, vol. 17, 
no. 3, 1962, pp. 253-263. JSTOR. 
http://www.jstor.org/stable/2932423. Accessed 14 Nov. 2016.

"Great Star" flag of pre-Civil War USA