LITR 4328 American Renaissance

Research Posts 2015
(research post assignment)


Research Post 1


Heidi Kreeger

Speaking Honestly of Abe

     When you think of “great” speeches given by our nation’s leaders, Abraham Lincoln is always on the short list of profound orators. His image is one steeped in honesty, and doing the right thing. One of my personal favorites from Lincoln is The Gettysburg Address, and while discussing the speech during class one of my peers commented that he was not necessarily an advocate for the abolishment of slavery, but was rather more focused on keeping the union together. This piqued my interest and I set out to find answers to the question: was Abe Lincoln an abolitionist or not?

     I began my search in a non-conventional way, and found short answers to my questions on the History Channel’s website. They have a page that lists five facts you may not know about Lincoln, and if historically accurate in its entirety, it is my favorite source for condensed information on this topic. The first fact “answers” my question in the simplest of terms as it says point blank that he was not an abolitionist. They go on to say that

Lincoln did believe that slavery was morally wrong, but there was one big problem: It was sanctioned by the highest law in the land, the Constitution… In a three-hour speech in Peoria, Illinois, in the fall of 1854, Lincoln presented more clearly than ever his moral, legal and economic opposition to slavery—and then admitted he didn’t know exactly what should be done about it within the current political system”.

The website goes on to say that Lincoln did not believe that blacks and whites should have the same rights. This seems contrary to one of the most powerful lines in the Gettysburg Address, the opening line in fact, that “our fathers brought forth on this continent, a new nation, conceived in Liberty, and dedicated to the proposition that all men are created equal”. History Channel’s elaboration is this:

“Though Lincoln argued that the founding fathers’ phrase “All men are created equal” applied to blacks and whites alike, this did not mean he thought they should have the same social and political rights. His views became clear during an 1858 series of debates [where] Lincoln made his position clear. “I will say then that I am not, nor ever have been, in favor of bringing about in any way the social and political equality of the white and black races,” he began, going on to say that he opposed blacks having the right to vote, to serve on juries, to hold office and to intermarry with whites.

Of course this information is slightly shocking to me, and I am confident that I am not alone in this sentiment. In his article “About Lincoln” by C.W. Dustin, he speaks on this fact when he says that “The majority of people, especially those of the younger generation, would probably say, at once, that Lincoln was an undoubted abolitionist…It is, I think, the general impression; and quite naturally so, because of his issuance of the Emancipation Proclamation”. But the History Channel has something to say about the go-to argument on the Emancipation Proclamation as well! They say that:

Since Lincoln issued the Emancipation Proclamation as a military measure, it didn’t apply to border slave states like Delaware, Maryland, Kentucky and Missouri, all of which had remained loyal to the Union. Lincoln also exempted selected areas of the Confederacy that had already come under Union control in hopes of gaining the loyalty of whites in those states. In practice, then, the Emancipation Proclamation didn’t immediately free a single slave, as the only places it applied were places where the federal government had no control—the Southern states currently fighting against the Union.

Here I can see that my peer was correct, his proclamation and even his support of the thirteenth amendment can be attributed to war strategies more than his actual belief that slavery needed to be abolished. Obviously Lincoln was a complicated man, with one foot on each side of abolitionism. I think John Sexton describes this dichotomy best through the viewpoint of one of Lincoln’s greatest critics, Frederick Douglas. In his article “On Lincoln’s ‘Pragmatism’”, Sexton speaks on the Douglas and his Eulogy “Oration in Memory of Abraham Lincoln” in which he states that

Seeking to bury as well as to praise, Douglass charged not that Lincoln was a racist (the former once said that the latter was the only white man he ever encountered who treated him, a black man, without a particle of evident race prejudice) but that black people ranked second in Lincoln’s affections to the Union as a whole—and therefore, practically speaking, subordinate to the white majority. According to Douglass, Lincoln, while he was responsible for emancipation, or a “new dispensation of freedom,” was also “preeminently the white man’s President, entirely devoted to the welfare of white men.” Moreover, “in his interests, in his associations, in his habits of thought, and in his prejudices, [Lincoln] was a white man”.

          It seems then that the answer to my question is an unequivocal “no, Abe Lincoln was not an abolitionist”. That is not to say that he was a bad person, or consciously believed that black people were inferior, simply that he was a man shaped by the times and the situation he was placed in. At the end of the day we can all be thankful that the war resulted the way that it did; however, I still have lingering questions. The History Channel website also listed as a fact you may not know that Lincoln supported colonization and believed the best solution for race relations and ending slavery was to relocate the majority of black people to Africa, specifically Liberia. Apparently Henry Clay and Thomas Jefferson, Lincoln’s political heroes also supported colonization and I would be interested to know what made such great men convinced that this was the best answer?

Sources:

·        http://www.history.com/news/5-things-you-may-not-know-about-lincoln-slavery-and-emancipation

·        http://coursesite.uhcl.edu/HSH/Whitec/texts/AmClassics/founders/Lincoln/LincolnGettysburg.htm

·        http://www.jstor.org/stable/25121555?seq=1&Search=yes&resultItemClick=true&searchText=lincoln&searchText=slavery&searchUri=%2Faction%2FdoBasicSearch%3FQuery%3Dlincoln%2Bslavery%26amp%3Bprq%3Dracism%2Bantebellum%26amp%3Bgroup%3Dnone%26amp%3Bfc%3Doff%26amp%3Bso%3Drel%26amp%3Bacc%3Don%26amp%3Bwc%3Don%26amp%3Bhp%3D25#page_scan_tab_contents

·        http://www.jstor.org/stable/full/10.1086/669689?Search=yes&resultItemClick=true&searchText=racism&searchText=antebellum&searchUri=%2Faction%2FdoBasicSearch%3FQuery%3Dracism%2Bantebellum%2B%26amp%3Bprq%3Dracism%2Bamerican%2BRenaissance%26amp%3Bgroup%3Dnone%26amp%3Bwc%3Don%26amp%3Bhp%3D25%26amp%3Bso%3Drel%26amp%3Bacc%3Don%26amp%3Bfc%3Doff#rf8