LITR 4232 American Renaissance

Sample Student Research Project 2013
Journal

Amanda Duarte

November 22, 2013

Civil Disobedience: 1849-2013

Introduction:

            Typically I write and research subjects that are based on what is going on with my life because I can get passionate about the work to make it more significant not only for myself but for the readers as well. I contemplated on my subject matter and kept switching focus from one topic to the next because I did there were too many directions that I could take this research. I like for my research and work to have some significance to my life, this is my way of taking the information I gather so that I can make it memorable. I don’t want to know a lot of useless information; which is why the topic I finally chose to research stuck out the most. There have been several topics on my mind that I couldn’t quite connect. First off I wanted to research something along the lines of slavery and human trafficking since we talked in class, on a few occasions, about how people should go about discussing these topics in a classroom setting or to other individuals or groups in general. I did a little searching and could find nothing on how to talk about or approach the topic.

So then I happened to come across Henry David Thoreau’s “Civil Disobedience,” and a light went off. Although the two subjects may not seem to have a thing in common, I realized that there are times when in order for something unjust to be brought to justice in society, civil disobedience has been known to be effective. Slavery and human trafficking are not right but there were people who acted out civil disobedience to bring justice for the slaves and rights for the free blacks, and in more modern days protests have been popular in achieving Lately, I have come across many instances of unjust actions taking place where the justice system in place fails to bring true justice. This journal will discuss general information about civil disobedience, a biography of Henry David Thoreau, a review of two articles: “Thoreau’s Radical Moment—and Ours” by Wen Stephenson, and “Thoreau’s Case for Political Disengagement” by Carl Bankston III, a few helpful links to websites that could be helpful in the search for information on civil disobedience, as well as a few pictures pertaining to the topic.      

   

Civil Disobedience: General Information

            Civil disobedience is a symbolic, non-violent violation of the law, done deliberately in protest against some form of perceived injustice. Mere dissent, protest, or disobedience of the law does not qualify. The act must be nonviolent, open and visible, illegal, performed for the moral purpose of protesting an injustice, and done with the expectation of being punished (thefreedictionary.com). And according to Dr. White’s notes, Civil disobedience describes a persistent human activity that can go by many names and be practiced in numerous ways. In a review of Lewis Perry’s Civil Disobedience: An American Tradition, civil disobedience has “famously been invoked to oppose war and slavery, to support temperance, voting rights and labor reform, and to protest taxes, nuclear power, abortion and various environmental abuses” (Kirkus Reviews). Perry’s book discusses the history of civil disobedience from its origins to the more recent keystone pipeline opposition, in chronological order.  Throughout history there have been a number of historical figures who have been associated with civil disobedience. These figures include Henry David Thoreau, Martin Luther King, Mohandas Gandhi, Rosa Parks, and even Jesus of Nazareth. 

            There are risks and advantages to resisting higher laws, though. Each of the people listed above did pay a price for their disobedience, but the outcome was rewarding more often than not. There is a risk of not seeing results immediately when acting out civil disobedience; which then, people who back the ideas may turn to violence (Dr. White’s Notes). In the United States there are many people or common folk who act out and practice civil disobedience. In his time, Thoreau protested and was arrested for something he felt was unjust. In his essay “Civil Disobedience,” Thoreau says that people should not wait for the government to act against and put in reformation of injustice. If an individual has what is just on their side then that individual should do what is just in a peaceful and open manor.

Herbert Storing predicted that civil disobedience would die out after Martin Luther King Jr.’s assassination but has since been proved wrong. Civil disobedience continues to be an active part of liberal democracies. Even though there have been many historical figures who have acted out in civil disobedience, there are still examples of people who take this sort of action to this day. An example of civil disobedience in modern day would be worker slowdowns. On November 8, 2013 there was an outbreak of civil disobedience in downtown Los Angeles. Fifty Wal-Mart employees and supporters were arrested in the street protesting what they called the retailer’s “poverty wages.” During this act of civil disobedience over five hundred protesters gathered in the streets to protest “an end to low wages, unpredictable part-time hours and retaliation for speaking out,” according to Huffington Post. This is only one of the many outbreaks that have occurred in the country for similar demands against the company.

 

Biography: Henry David Thoreau

Henry David Thoreau was born in Concord, Massachusetts on July 12, 1817 to his parents John and Cynthia. John moved the family from Concord to Chelmsford and Boston due to business opportunities but then moved back to Concord in 1823 to establish a pencil making business. Thoreau had two older siblings, Helen and John Jr., both siblings grew up to be schoolteachers and helped pay for Henry Thoreau’s college expenses with their salary. After he graduated college Thoreau began teaching at the district school in Concord, then at a school he and his brother opened, it closed in 1841. He was offered boarding at the Emerson’s family home where he was to earn his keep as a handyman; while there he concentrated on his writing. Thoreau soon realized that he his writing was not making him enough money so for a steady income, he relied on the family pencil business and he became a surveyor. He invented a machine that resulted in a pencil that wrote with a smooth line. With his improvements the pencils were now equal quality to those being made by the German company, Faber. The company shifted from pencil making to supply finely ground plumbago to printing companies. He continued to run the company after his father died in 1859. Like the writer he was, Thoreau continued his writing using business documents as scrap paper to his unfinished works. In 1847 as part of a response to a request from the secretary of his Harvard class, Thoreau described his many jobs as  “a Schoolmaster—a Private Tutor, a Surveyor—a gardener, a farmer—a painter [house painter], a carpenter, a mason, a day-laborer, a pencil maker, a glass-paper maker, a writer, and sometimes a poetaster” (http://thoreau.library.ucsb.edu/thoreau_life.html). Thoreau built a small house on the shores of Walden Pond in 1845 where he lived alone for two years. In 1847 he abandoned that home and refused to pay the town tax and the consequence was jail time. Thoreau wrote non-fiction books, essays, and poetry totaling over twenty volumes. Some of these works include Walden, A Week, The Maine Wods, Cape Cod, and the essays A Winter Walk, A Walk to Wachusett, A Yankee in Canada, and Civil Disobedience. Thoreau began to suffer from tuberculosis in 1835 and suffered from it from time to time for years after. In 1859 he developed bronchitis and his health steadily declined after that. He spent his last few years revising and editing some of his work then died on May 6, 1862 at age 44.

 

Article Reviews

1. “Thoreau’s Radical Moment—And Ours” by Wen Stephenson

Wen Stephenson’s “Thoreau’s Radical Moment – And Ours” is a story covering the construction of the Keystone XL Pipeline and comparing the acts of civil disobedience that have taken place in protest against building it to Henry David Thoreau’s “readiness to speak the truth, forcefully and without compromise…no matter what risks it might have entailed.” Even though protests do not always prove effective, activists continue to express their principles. The article begins with information about Keystone and quickly makes a connection to Thoreau’s principle.

Keystone is a pipeline built by TransCanada Corporation, which will transport crude oil from the Alberta tar sands through the United States to the Gulf Coast. The problem with this pipeline is that the Alberta tar sands is one of the largest carbon pools on the planet and moving so much crude oil from there would emit more carbon into the atmosphere than what humans can live in. Stephenson brings forth how radical Thoreau was and his purpose behind his actions and reflects on how the climate activists have followed Thoreau’s footsteps in participating in nonviolent law breaking to make a change in an act that benefits a large group of people.

Today we face a human crisis as extreme in its way as the one faced by Thoreau…it sounds crazy. But just as Thoreau and other radical abolitionists were willing to say and do “crazy” and “radical” things—like put their bodies in the way of coal shipments…not because it’s politically expedient, but because it’s morally imperative.

Stephenson says that Thoreau may have never imagined that other activists would turn resistance into intolerable injustice demonstrating the power of radical nonviolence but it is necessary in making imperative changes for the benefit of the people.

Although this article is bias in favor of climate activists, it is a wonderful example of how activists throughout history have advocated for the people by participating in civil disobedience. The article gives an accurate history of Thoreau and other historical figures that have used his principle to make a change. He connects today’s climate activists with other activists throughout history who have made a difference using Thoreau’s principle.  

 

2. “Thoreau’s Case for Political Disengagement” by Carl L. Bankston III

            Bankston begins his article by clarifying what Thoreau’s point of the essay. Bankston says the essay “was a call for the autonomy of the individual from civic entanglements.” He then begins to break the essay down giving the reader Thoreau’s arguments and attitude toward the state calling him a “philosophical anarchist” who “maintains that government is only an instrument through which people act and that it should leave people alone as much as possible.” Bankston reminds the reader that Thoreau was against the government because of its war with Mexico and its acceptance to the existence of slavery in the south. Thoreau’s argument in “Civil Disobedience” is not that people should be against the government but should use insubordination as “an act of moral Disengagement from politics.” 

            Later in the article, Bankston points out that in today’s time, Thoreau would have been wrong in many ways. As time passed, the United States moved further away from Thoreau’s idea of the independent individual. One approach he goes into is of understanding Civil Disobedience as one expression of individualism. Bankston’s argument is that Thoreau “has little in common with the modern social justice advocates who claim him as an intellectual ancestor.” He does not completely disagree with Thoreau, but finds some ways to apply his principles to fit problems that occur in present day. He does, however clarify that the essay is not a call to activism but a “manifesto of political and social strengths and weaknesses of that trend in American thought.” The essay is more a reminder to the American people that our purpose is not to build the perfect world, but to live according to our moral senses.

            Bankston’s article doesn’t seem to have a bias; his argument is that the readers should look at Civil Disobedience not as an active literary piece but to read and think critically, asking questions and arguing it to make it work for what the current issues are. “Thoreau’s Case for Political Disengagement” could be applied to spark discussion about a new way of thinking and applying Thoreau’s ideas/principles.

 

WEBSITES

1.    http://plato.stanford.edu/entries/civil-disobedience/#PunCivDis

This webpage consists of four main sections providing explanation about civil disobedience: definitions, justification, rights, and punishment. This site is informative and useful to someone seeking detailed information on civil disobedience.

 

2.    http://thoreau.library.ucsb.edu/thoreau_life.html

This is a website that has information that is all about Thoreau. The site provides texts of his writings for publication, his journal, his correspondence, and other uncollected papers. Most of the material has never been published before. This site would be helpful to anyone seeking information on Thoreau as well as his works.

     3.  http://www.taterenner.com/nokxl.php

This webpage consists of images from the Keystone XL Rally and March, as well as a link to an organization called 350. The organization has been building a global grassroots movement to solve the climate change crisis. On 350.org, there are multiple articles showcasing acts of civil disobedience in present day. If someone were looking for examples of insubordination in present day, they would hit the jackpot at www.350.org.    

 

Conclusion

 

               My research began as a blur. I wanted to find a topic that I would get passionate about; something that I could find meaning in, or find a new way of thinking about the literary work. After much contemplation I found my topic, civil disobedience then and now. After researching information about Thoreau I was able to understand more of where critics were coming from when they analyzed his ideas and principles. Though there are many versions of Thoreau’s biography I found it most beneficial to gather information from multiple sources to write my unique version of his life story. I found it interesting that Thoreau knew he was dying and was able to revise and edit some of his work before his death. All sorts of activists throughout history have used Thoreau’s essay, “Civil Disobedience” as a basis for their political insubordination. In my research I found a book that talks about civil disobedience through history from Thoreau’s time up to 2013. I also included recent outbursts of civil disobedience.

            The articles I found correspond with each other one seems to be bias toward acts of political insubordination while the other gives each side credit where it is due. Wen Stephenson’s article is biased in that he used Thoreau’s essay to justify that civil disobedience is right in the climate activist’s protest against Keystone. He provided accurate information about political insubordination as well as the essay Civil Disobedience. However, he failed to give some sort of credit to the other half. Carl Bankston III also provided his readers with adequate information about Thoreau’s work. He, unlike Stephenson, gave proper justification for his argument, discussing both sides.

            In addition to all of this I have provided links to websites that I found helpful throughout my research as well as pictures that may aid others in understanding more about civil disobedience throughout history.

 

Bibliography

 

Description of Civil disobedience from: http://legal-dictionary.thefreedictionary.com/Civil+Disobedience

 

"CIVIL DISOBEDIENCE An American Tradition." Kirkus Reviews 81.20 (2013): 97. Academic Search Complete. Web. 21 Nov. 2013.

 

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2013/11/08/walmart-arrests_n_4227411.htm

 

 

 


"Great Star" flag of pre-Civil War USA