(2013 midterm assignment)

Sample Student Midterm Answers 2013

#2a: Short Essay (Favorite Passage)

LITR 4232
American Renaissance
 

 

Amanda Duarte

Part 2 A: Connecting with Nature

I chose Ralph Waldo Emerson’s “Nature” because in such a short essay, Emerson is able to speak to a wide audience. When he wrote the essay, the industrial revolution was taking place so the settlers were experiencing the loss of closeness to nature and more fiercely gained a never-ending desire to be close to it once more. This essay will discuss the connection a background in history has with literature and then examine how Emerson addresses the human’s desire and loss for nature. 

Although there isn’t a direct connection in the text that shows this loss, with a historical background, readers can make that connection when Emerson speaks of the “charming landscape…made up of twenty or thirty farms,” the once untouched and forested land has now been industrialized, that is, made into many farms (ch.1 pp. 9). When thinking of the land before, during, and after the industrial revolution, one can project that there has been a loss in the connection of man to nature. This loss of purity, so to speak, leads to a desire for it once again. And the destruction of nature by man, only leads to man’s desire for pureness. I think that throughout the course of time, this work of literature will continue to speak to a range of audiences because humans will always have a desire to be closer to nature/purity. Emerson says that the “universe is composed of nature and the soul” and that humans should be ranked under the name “nature” (Intro. pp. 5). This supports the idea of humans having a lasting, and unfulfilling desire to be closer to nature because by falling under the rank of “nature,” a person or creature would naturally desire a connection to the purity of its rank.

Although man has disrupted nature, since his existence, nature will always remain pure. Paragraph ten exerts the theme that nature has a purity and innocence that is untouched by man, “To speak truly, few adult persons can see nature…The sun illuminates only the eye of the man, but shines into the eye and the heart of the child.” By writing this paragraph, it is as if he is trying to reclaim something that is lost, just as childhood innocence is lost at some point in our maturing. Why is it that few adults can see nature? One possibility is that life is so hectic that we don’t “stop and smell the roses,” something as simple as taking a moment out of your day to enjoy the warm summer breeze, or that moment of pure bliss when the sun rays peep through the clouds brings such an indescribable mix of emotions; sublimity at its finest.

            Emerson gives the reader an assertion to nature’s purity and man’s connection to nature in paragraph eleven:

In the presence of nature, a wild delight runs through the man, in spite of real sorrows. Nature says,—he is my creature…Not the sun or the summer alone, but every hour and season yields its tribute of delight; for every hour and change corresponds to and authorizes a different state of the mind… Nature is a setting that fits equally well a comic or a mourning piece. In good health, the air is a cordial of incredible virtue.

When talking about man in the presence of nature, the feeling of sublimity is obvious. Perhaps this we desire nature so much because we belong to nature. We take delight in it, and it corresponds so well to our every situation, emotion, and possibly even more than that.

            Emerson was able to relate his essay to a vast audience and in so few words. In order for a person to understand a work of literature they must carefully analyze it; making a knowledge of history important. But even if someone did not have a historical background I believe his essay still relays the connection that man, nature, and desire have with one another. Having knowledge of history eases the analytical process of literature, but what makes this work continue to flourish is that people are still able to relate to “Nature” even without it, even though a particular work is not a historical romance.