Dorothy Noyes
1.
Stepping Outside the Box
Upon reading the numerous model assignments, I found myself taking a look not
only at the truly amazing content of what I was reading in comparison to my own
interpretations, but also the mechanics of what these students had written. I am
a rule-follower, someone who needs structure and prompts and things to be a
certain way. I am surprised everyday that I love literature and its multiple
meanings as much as I do, because I feel that it is a contradiction of my “Type
A” personality. This assignment, this web review, had me stare right into the
face of conflicting opinions, styles, and set-ups, and understand that it’s not
only just okay to not follow one set of rules, but also kind of awesome.
Two of the works I compared directly to one another were the long essays of Eric
Cherrie and Amber Criswell. The first thing I noticed was how different
stylistically the two were. Although both students received the same prompt, the
same subject matter, they approached it so differently. In his article, “The
American What?” Eric makes his essay extremely personal, inviting the reader
into both his family life and his own mind. His definitions are determined not
by any book, but by his own experience with the text. Amber, on the other hand,
takes a different approach in her article, “The Romanticism of American
Renaissance Literature”. I felt when reading her essay that I was taking in an
academic piece, both very informative and also emotionally detached. I learned a
lot about the subject matter, but did not feel connected to the author.
Another aspect of those two specific essays that I read at length was their
content. The two authors never said the exact same thing, their answers were
slightly different, almost paralleled to each other, and I never disagreed with
either one. I thought Eric’s comparison of American Renaissance works to
mythology was brilliant, while Amber approached the same Romantic readings as a
“diametrically opposing realism” which I also thought was apt and well put.
Reading their works side by side, I was struck once again by the power of
literature to illicit both similar and opposing viewpoints on the exact same
material.
After reading Amber and Eric’s works compared to each
other, I decided to look at another essay and compare it specifically to my own
views and thoughts on the piece. In Brittany Fletcher’s short essay, “The
Headless Boxer” she looks at Washington Irving’s
The Legend
of Sleepy Hollow:
“ Why the story is so popular still remains as a question
today. I became fascinated by this question and it, along with the language
used, is why this story and particular passage made such an impression on me.
The language and connections made from The Legend
of Sleepy Hollow are a few of the many reasons the
headless horsemen still continues to “ride” through literature today.”
This excerpt from
Reading over everyone’s work, which I know they worked just as hard on as I do
with everything I turn in, made such an impression on me as a sometimes rigid
individual. While I learned so much, and was so impressed with the obvious
talent and intelligence of the authors, it was in their differences with each
other and myself that I took the most away from. I’m not here to say anyone is
right or wrong; I’m simply taking away from this the beauty of the words we have
been given to read this semester, and how amazing it is that we can all take
from it what we need.
|