Valerie Mead
Whitman’s Sublimity and
Every student learns a great deal from doing the assigned
readings as well as attending and making a point of interactively participating
in class discussions and lectures.
However, when you are a student, there is always a
little something left to be desired, no matter how well you do all of the things
mentioned above.
This is usually noticed around the time this said
student is about to start an assignment, whether it be a really serious one,
like a midterm, or one of lesser importance, like an analytical essay.
Students who feel confident in themselves only have
to start such an assignment to begin to question this confidence, and things
truly begin to fall apart from there.
Students mainly start questioning themselves
because they are typically unsure as to exactly what it is that the professor is
looking for with this assignment, especially as it pertains to grading.
In order to answer our questions (without bothering
the professor or the tutoring centers) and pacify our fears about such issues,
usually a new element has to be added to the situation.
That is where the idea of looking at previous
student’s assignments becomes practical and even beneficial.
These model assignments give the students a fairly
decent idea of what the professor expects of your content, depth, analysis, and
tone of your written assignments by showing you an assignment that he or she
obviously values and thinks is worthy of showing as an example of what is
wanted.
These model assignments give us information that we
otherwise would not have had access to, and they help students be more confident
of their work, which is why they are such an unexpected and welcome surprise.
Matt Chavez’s essay on “Whitman on Sublimity” shows how
Whitman and his works are sublime, and that really caught my attention.
This interested me from the beginning because I am
still having some trouble fully comprehending some of the aspects of the
sublime, which in itself is a crucial element of American Renaissance
literature, especially depending on the specific authors and/or works one is
focusing on.
I was interested in this essay because I had hoped that it
would clarify some lingering issues that I have on the subject.
It was well written, focused, and easy to
understand, all of which are seen as staples or basics, but do indeed play a
crucial role in understanding and learning.
The language used in the essay is clear and
concise, which helped me to understand what he was saying and why he felt it was
important.
However, he also uses jargon that only literature majors
would understand, which is important as well, because it shows that he
understands the material that is being covered in class and it also gives the
people reading it a chance to learn from that which he obviously understands
fairly well.
Chavez takes the broader aspects of Romanticism and ties
them to specific aspects of written works from that period, specifically linking
the idea of the sublime with the works of Walt Whitman.
By tying in these larger issues, Chavez makes sure
to let the reader know that this is relevant information to the American
Renaissance, and it helped me to learn of the larger connections between them.
Most importantly, Chavez incorporated a poem by
Whitman into his essay, thus using it for specific, detailed support of his
statements and further cementing his points into the idea of the reader.
I learned from this essay specifically how Whitman
and the sublime tie in together.
Chavez helped to clarify this issue by saying
“Romanticism is about the individual’s experience, and Whitman is turned out
unaccountably by his disdain for a nature which is no reflection of him, but a
thing set apart…The sublimity of nature is divine in character, and the divine
cannot be, nor should it be, understood. That Whitman captures so many key
feature of Romanticism in so few lines is representative itself of the point
Whitman makes” (Chavez, par. 4).
This particularly made the issue seem much more
common and easier to comprehend, which helped me to further grasp the concept of
the sublime in how it relates to American Renaissance literature as a whole and
our class in general.
Another particularly informative essay for me was Brittany
Fletcher’s “The Headless Boxer.”
This essay made me look at it
because of the title—I knew it must have been some sort of reference to the
character of the Headless Horseman in Irving’s
The Legend of
Sleepy Hollow, which I have found to be one of
the most enjoyable works from the first half of this semester, and having a
boxer myself made me somewhat curious as to how the title would work out.
This essay’s language is concise and clear, which
is another reason I chose to read it.
There are few mentions of technical literary terms,
but everything that is mentioned is broken down and explained really well.
Fletcher ties in more personal elements into the
essay, relating the story to her personal fears and feelings, whereas Chavez did
just the opposite.
However, I was able to relate more with Fletcher’s
friendlier tone, and it was almost like we had an existing rapport going on this
entire time, which made it easier to learn from her than from Chavez.
She also ties in the story’s use of language and
how it relates to typical gothic elements, the latter of which I find supremely
interesting.
Fletcher points out many important concepts in her essay,
some of which I know and understand, others with which I am struggling.
She brings up the issue that “The
whole text [Sleepy
Hallow] is filled with a successful mixture of
Reason and Romance,” (Fletcher, Par. 3), which is something I had not thought of
sufficiently, and now realize is true.
Fletcher also brings up a concept called
correspondence, which she says “is the connection between thought and the
atmosphere around” (Par. 3) and explains it so that someone like myself, who has
never heard it, could understand what it means and why it is relevant.
She then applies it to
Sleepy Hollow
and the gothic imagery that it invokes.
Her ability to tie in concepts with the works that
are given really makes this an excellent essay, and I definitely learned many
useful things from it.
The final essay that I choose to work on is Eric Cherrie’s
“The Fall of the House of Winkle.”
I honestly chose to read this
essay because the title drew me in—it referenced both Poe and Irving, two
authors I highly enjoy from this period, as well as a character on
The Big Bang Theory,
a show I absolutely adore.
Needless to say, I was intrigued with what he had
to say.
The essay does not use as common of language as Chavez or
Fletcher, but focuses on the important terms and definitions used throughout the
first half of this course.
This does not make it as easy to understand as the
previously mentioned essays did, but there is a lot of readily accessible
information that is vital to my understanding this class as well as this time
period, so the little extra work was definitely worth it.
Cherrie focuses on
As
students, sometimes we face difficulties when learning a particular topic or
concept, or we often times find that we need extra help when an important exam
or paper is due.
Though we do our best to read all of the assigned
works and to pay attention and actively participate in class, sometimes that is
not enough, and extra, outside help is needed in order for a person to learn as
much as she can and do as well as she can in any given class.
This is also true for American Renaissance
Literature students, which is why access to well written student sample essays
is a great idea (though highly underutilized) for helping students learn.
Access to these well written essays allows the
students to learn things that they could not or did not in class, and they can
also help to clarify an issue you are having difficulty with.
This is true for me, as well, especially in
literature courses.
Needless to say, I learned a great deal from the
essays that I chose, and I can only hope that my essay is good enough to help
someone else learn in the future.
|