Andy Feith Taking the Web Review on its own Terms
My favorite sentence from Eric
Cherrie’s short essay “The Fall of the House of Winkle” is
“The ability nature
has to destroy what people know is both gothic and sublime.”
After Rip Van Winkle’s twenty year sleep, his house is deserted and desolate.
Nature, given enough time, destroys everything we humans build up. Nothing is
permanent; everything decays. There is real suffering in that fact, and I
appreciate that EC has identified it. It’s some of the reason why the gothic and
the sublime are associated with an element of terror.
When I read Rip Van Winkle, I am more amused than
horrified at Rip’s strange predicament, but EC’s short essay makes me realize
that to actually experience what Rip goes through would be traumatic. “Home”, to
me, is such a comfort and a sense of security; to come home one day and find it
unoccupied and in severe disrepair would probably provoke me to tears. “Where
are the people who live here, who know me, who love me? And what the hell
happened to my house?” (That’s what I imagine myself thinking, anyway). I wonder
if the gothic and the sublime have somewhat lost their power today, when
“nature” in the United States has largely been subdued and relegated to a few
small safe spaces (like national parks), and Native Americans, who used to
function as the fearsome “other” and were associated with unconquered nature,
are largely confined to reservations.
Matt Chavez in the short essay “Whitman on
Sublimity” also notes the power of nature in American romanticism; he goes as
far as to say that “If there is one lesson that the Romantics taught, this
lesson is [the] importance of nature, as home, as teacher, as man’s reflection”.
He finds in “When I Heard the Learn’d Astronomer” a depiction of two ways of
perceiving nature: one may, like Whitman (or Emerson, for that matter) feel an
inner sense of harmony
and communion with nature, or
like the “learn’d astronomer”, one may study it as an object, separate from
one’s self. The astronomer gains respect and adulation for quantifying the
heavens. (Wendell Berry, an agrarian writer from the later 20th
century ‘til today, has a similar distaste for quantifying nature. To roughly
paraphrase him from memory, “Some things that are essential and valuable to
human life are unquantifiable)”. For romantics like Whitman, nature, like the
soul, like God, is beyond human comprehension. It is “more to experience than to
understand” (MC).
Brittany Fletcher’s “My Gothic is Your Gothic” is
notable for showing a few different usages of the gothic, including a personal
anecdote of her own. She defines the gothic as existing “to help build suspense
or… a dark tone.” That definition is a bit broad for my taste; I could put just
about every horror movie from “Invasion of the Body Snatchers” to “Saw 17” in
that box. For me, the gothic is most associated with certain images: a decrepit
mansion illuminated by thunder, or a red beating heart under the floorboards in
a darkened room. BF examines an excerpt from “The Fall of the House of Usher” in
which correspondence heightens the feeling of gothic fear, and I’d probably add
correspondence as a common technique associated with “the gothic.” In the
darkness of the night, windows, towers, and trees can be distorted by the
imagination and made into menacing monsters; this is another common technique.
My feelings on the gothic are like what one supreme court justice said about
pornography: I can’t define it, but I know it when I see it.
|