Rochelle LaTouche
Differing Perspectives
The three posts
I read for this assignment were “The Struggle for a Voice for Minorities,” “The
Indian Captivity Narrative,” and “Gaps
in Creation Stories: The Search for Truth.” “The Struggle for Voice…” and “The
Indian Captivity Narrative” both involved minorities but discussed different
aspects. “The Struggle…” discussed minorities as a whole, while “The Indian
Captivity Narrative” focused specifically on writings involving Indians
capturing white Americans. Other than those two similarities, the three topics
varied significantly. The one component they all had in common, though, was that
they were written clearly and in an organized manner. I chose the three because
the language and organization of the pieces appealed to me, and I could
comprehend what they were trying to say.
The first post I
read was “The Struggle for a Voice for Minorities.”
The author of the essay asserts that females and
minorities are not represented fairly in today’s society; they have as much to
offer as any white male writer, yet their texts are not as commonly taught in
the classroom. I felt like her essay was a bit opinionated with little factual
evidence. I read the texts the author was referring to, so I knew what they were
about already. In her essay, the text excerpts were not elaborated on to the
point where I was learning anything new, other than the author’s opinions. I
thought she had good opinions; they were just a bit underdeveloped.
One
point in her essay where I thought she made a valid point was when she said
“Through their [the Indians’] attempt to explain ‘the origin of the earth and
its people,’ we are given an intimate glance at how they set up their society
and behaved.
We can also see how their beliefs vary from ours and we
can begin to draw conclusions about how our religion and belief system has
evolved from then to now.”’ This was probably the most insightful piece of her
essay. She analyzes the significance of the creation/origin stories and how they
influence people today. Overall, from this post I learned that good opinions
need good evidence to fully develop the idea.
The second post
I read had to do with minorities as well, but more specifically with Indians.
The research post is titled “The Indian Captivity Narrative.” The author defines
the term Indian Captivity Narrative and then reveals that there are thousands of
them published. I did not know that there were so many out there. I found it
interesting that “the captivity narrative as a genre encompasses everything from
slave narratives to UFO abductions, but the Indian captivity narrative itself is
restricted to non-Indians being captured by Indians.” It amused me that UFO
abductions were considered captivity narratives and not science fiction!
The author also describes Mary Jemison’s case, which is a piece I am familiar
with because we had a student explain it to us in class. The author also claimed
that captivity narratives were published to praise God and for economic support.
I would have thought that they were published to inform people, so that is
something new that I learned. Overall, the author discusses various aspects of
the Indian Captivity Narrative that are interesting and relevant to ideas we
have learned in class.
The last post I
read is about religion and is called “Gaps
in Creation Stories: The Search for Truth.” The author of this piece essentially
claims that there are gaps in creation stories, hence the title. She states that
“almost every religion struggles with creationism.” These struggles lead to
questions such as: If nothing existed before God, then where did God come from?
Had he always been there? Etc. She, then, offers the quick solution of “the only
answer I'm ever going to get is: it relies on faith.” She claims that for any
question we have about religion, we should recall on faith. Like the first post,
I felt like this was a pretty opinionated piece. The author tells a quick story,
talks about questions facing religion, and then answers these questions with
“faith.” I feel like I learned about the author’s opinions and experiences. I
also learned that more concrete evidence helps support an opinion better, as in
the first post I read although the author claims religion has little concrete
evidence.
|