Veronica Ramirez 
An Insight into Early American Literature Through Women’s Literature 
When I signed up for Early American Literature this semester I came in knowing a 
little about early American literature since it has presented in other courses 
as the background for the founding of America, usually the texts surrounding the 
Founding Fathers. This semester has been very interesting though, besides 
gaining general knowledge about the development of early American literature, 
what has extended my knowledge the most was the discussion and my research posts 
on early women authors and by extension, the views on women’s education and how 
women’s education in early America influenced literature.  
Studying women in early American literature has increased the breadth of authors 
that I had previously encountered and I have learned about the issues specific 
to texts by women, for women, and about women’s education. The texts presented 
in this course, for example Sor Juana’s poems, Susanna Rowson’s
Charlotte Temple and Thomas 
Jefferson’s “Letter to Nathaniel Burwell on Women’s Education” all help to 
demonstrate the objective which tries to “reconcile the culture wars over which 
America is the real America and Which America to teach? " Even though the 
founding fathers receive a large amount of exposure, there are issues in early  
The history of women’s education that was presented by previous students in 
their midterms and research posts, combined with my midterm made me value the 
works of women even more because the types of texts that women created provided 
valuable information that have become for us a link to what life in early  
One of the most interesting texts in the course regarding the education of women 
was Thomas Jefferson‘s “Letter to Nathaniel Burwell on Women’s Education” 
written in 1818.  
Thomas Jefferson in the same letter, stated that he
believed that novels were “a 
great obstacle to good education” and though they were a “mass 
of trash” they were not however “without 
some distinction; some few modelling their narratives, although fictitious, on 
the incidents of real life, have been able to make them 
interesting and useful 
vehicles of sound morality”. Thomas Jefferson’s comment on novels conflicts with 
our current view of literature today, because most people connect literature 
with novels. I don’t think that Thomas Jefferson would have approved of 
Susanna Rowson as a popular novelist, but she did take the novel and make it a 
tool of “sound morality” by her authorial intrusion as the narrator’s voice in
Charlotte Temple. 
Susanna Rowson intrudes the opinion of the narrator of
Charlotte Temple in order to make 
sure that her moral message gets across. As a text illustrating proper behavior, 
it is unique in that instead of showing positive role models, Rowson shows the 
outcome of a good girl swayed by her emotions and peers instead of her duty and 
propriety. This novel also provides some information about the importance of the 
education of women, but is geared more towards educating the women in morals and 
proper behavior. Charlotte Temple also wishes for a better education for her 
daughter, mostly to avoid her own fate, but is important that she wishes her 
daughter to be instructed at all. Charlotte Temple uses her education from back 
in  
Even though educated women authors were able to write and publish, women’s 
outlets to expand their search for knowledge were limited. I studied Sor Juana 
as an author and as an educated woman more than her works, and she was very well 
educated but her choices in life were restricted by her own pursuit of her 
education. In my first research post I set out to find why Sor Juana is relevant 
to modern readers and I concluded it was “because her subjects are so modern and 
her reactions to her status of being a woman were so public” and she focused “on 
modern and progressive issues that are still relevant today, such as equality, 
women's education, and especially men's view of women.”
 In my second research post, Maria Luisa 
Bemberg, director of the film “Yo, la Peor de Todas,” summarized Sor Juana’s 
appeal through time and through cultures as “Sor Juana is more than Mexican, 
more than a Spanish colonial subject, more than Latin American, that the wings 
of her spirit transcend all borders” (Bemberg 81). 
Learning early American texts brings up these types of unique examples of what 
women authors had as outlets, what they were exposed to, what they had to bear, 
and as Adam Glasgow stated in his midterm “delving into 
less known texts from sources that we are not as comfortable reading about 
proves an effective way to understand what was previously foreign.” I 
would expand on what I have learned in this course and read more early novels 
especially by women authors. Thomas Jefferson mentioned Miss Maria Edgeworth and 
Madame Genlis, and even though they are both known for writing children’s book, 
or books on how to educate children, they both have a couple of novels that I 
think would complement the treatment of the novel that we did in class.  
Even though I already had some background in early American Literature, the part 
of the course that I enjoyed the most was the fact that course reached out to 
capture the few women that were writing during this time. This really helps to 
be able to place women’s writing in the overall structure of early American 
literature. Women’s literature in early  
 
  |